Jo|20| i am a sad lil nugget
& I like Sherlock. Obviously.
WAS SHAGGINGSHEZZA Currently: Reading:nothing, which is strange Writing: A non-Sherlock fanfic Watching:Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood Listening to: a lot of stuff
My Favourite People: Becca Sydney Misty Lauren
Queue Runs 24/7Networks AULock Network Johnlock Fanfiction Network
The moment where Billy is deducing John’s cycling habits is all fun and games until you relaise that this isnt why he is cycling to work, there is a underlying reason as to why he is doing it; he does not want to spend time with Mary.
Just like John the cycling was a cover up for the truth. Nothing said or done in this show is a coincidence as we all know what they say about coincidences.
Oh… Screaming! Good spot!
It’s also the reason Mary made Bill flinch while fixing his arm - he wouldn’t let go of the reason John was cycling to work. She knows. John knows. Everyone knows but Sherlock, apparently.
And Joe who lives in Flat 21A? A mirror for John from 221B? Nice.
John and Mary are canonically not happy together. This is CANON. It goes beyond shipping. It doesn’t matter if you ship johnlock or warstan or neither, the fact is we’ve been SHOWN that John and Mary aren’t in a happy relationship.
TEH: John looks like absolute dogshit the day he’s going to propose to Mary. He doesn’t talk about it like he’s excited. He states it as a fact, as an accepted inevitability but he doesn’t seem happy about it. Mrs. Hudson literally thinks John is seriously ill or leaving the country based on how he’s acting. The interactions between John and Mary aren’t horrible or anything. They seem comfortable enough, but not a couple gloriously thrilled about starting their lives together. Given that they’re newly engaged and hadn’t been dating long besides, it’s notable that they act the way they do. Not demonstrably UNHAPPY at this point, but not happy either.
TSoT: They seem pretty happy at the wedding, the happiest we see them in the show I would say, but this is a happy occasion and a celebratory mood is generally surrounding a wedding. But we see moments of doubt. During the wedding speech, Mary seems less than happy from certain things Sherlock says. John looks downright sad and regretful at times. His hand tremor starts acting up too. Then there’s pregnancy deduction, where neither John or Mary seem happy. Mary seems afraid and John seems pissed off. Yes it is a surprise but they’re an established couple with two incomes in their household, the writers chose to make the reaction the way they did. The happiness we see in that moment is between Sherlock and John, not John and Mary. On top of all that, the flashback is interesting. The flirty John on stag night but more so the fact that he’s not excited about the upcoming wedding and Mary doesn’t seem to be either. She’s at least doing planning but John is getting pushed along by her and Sherlock. They’re doing the work and John kind of desperately wants to be doing something else. And when Mrs. Hudson starts talking about John getting married, John loses his appetite.
HLV: I don’t even really need to say anything because it’s in your face but we see John having nightmares again, dreaming of Sherlock, throwing Mary’s hand off of him, pining over Sherlock and being a dick to Mary and the neighbor, Mary irritated with the mention of Sherlock, sniping back and forth, using Mary’s pregnancy as a weapon (they both do this), John and Mary going to work separately even though they work together, John keeping his clothes ready to pack. Then of course we have the shooting, the confrontation at the empty houses, the Baker Street domestic, and none of these moments show any happiness anywhere. Even the Christmas forgiveness scene. Even if you believe the forgiveness is genuine, John STILL says in a caveat that he’s pissed and it’s going to come out. And they still are fucking arguing about mowing the lawn and naming the baby.
TAB: Inside Sherlock’s mind palace, which makes it significant for different reasons. But John has essentially abandoned Mary for Sherlock and doesn’t even care enough to recognize her when she’s standing directly in front of him. Mary and John’s maid points out how shitty their marriage is MULTIPLE TIMES IN ONE SCENE. When Sherlock says Mary is in danger, again we have John having a total ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ reaction like “she’s probs with friends Holmes, let’s talk about you and me more.” And at the end when John says “I thought we were growing apart from each other”, he doesn’t sound particularly moved one way or the other. He doesn’t sound like he wishes it were true but he also doesn’t sound relieved that Mary is there. It’s incredibly awkward to watch. And we see right before MP John sets things right at Reichenbach, that Sherlock’s worst nightmare is John abandoning him for Mary. Sherlock begging John to stay and John basically saying “no, Mary is in charge and we are leaving.”
It’s much more difficult to get a true picture of Mary here because John is one of the protagonists so we are privy to his emotions more. She certainly seems intent on hanging onto John, but it’s hard to say why because they aren’t a happy couple.
If we had been shown loving and tender moments between John and Mary throughout the season, if we had seen them happy before AGRA was revealed, I could understand the defense of their relationship a lot more than I do. We don’t see them laugh together. We don’t see them say “I love you”. Their meeting, courtship, proposal, and exchange of vows all took place off screen. But we are shown them fighting, lying, angry, and unhappy. I just can’t root for a couple like that.
Amen.
Yet just by being a man and a woman following a traditional path, they are ‘assumed’ to be happy/functional/worth defending. They are seen to be CONFORMING to the rules of their gender and their social class, therefore it evokes a defence of the very rules themselves. People get angry that the relationship is even questioned. They demand an explicit declaration by John that he is not happy, that he is bisexual, that he is attracted to Sherlock. They hear him say he is not gay [he isn’t] and that he and Sherlock are not, nor ever where, a couple [which they were but not by John’s definition of a couple as that involves physical intimacy] We have witnessed in this fandom just how entrenched hetero-normative assumptions are in society. We have seen the rejection of gay/bi romance tropes which would have been accepted if they had been heterosexual romance tropes. We have experienced anger, hate, vitriol and just plain stubborn idiotic denial thrown at johnlockers by mainly females who are angry that a straight couple are not being honoured in the show when we should all be giving them the prime position of importance and accepting their relationship without question. So engrained is the ideal of the opposite sex couple that many refuse to see what is text in the show, not subtext, TEXT. Until Sherlock says the words ‘I am gay’ and John says ‘I am bisexual’, until John tells Mary the relationship with her is over and it was never going to work, many people will not believe what is right in front of their eyes. They need the explicit declaration.
JOHN: John Hamish Watson – just if you were looking for baby names.
JOHN: I choose the baby’s name. MARY: Not a chance.
SHERLOCK: William Sherlock Scott Holmes. (…) That’s the whole of it – if you’re looking for baby names.
This is such wonderful example of why Sherlock and John belong together and John and Mary don’t.
Both John and Sherlock are offering their full names to each other. And this is a strong contrast to Mary who never gives anyone her real name.
Of course there is the nearly identical wording as well.
And if you compare this with Mary’s snappish remark when John - who has been treated cruelly by her - wants to choose the baby’s name, it becomes clear that Mary is demanding and taking what she thinks is her right while John and Sherlock are offering and giving.
This is one of Mary’s functions in the narrative: emphasising the ultimately selfless love between Sherlock and John by setting it off against her selfishness.
And the use of full names is reminiscent of wedding vows as well. So in a way we get wedding vows for Sherlock and John while the “real” wedding between John and Mary is never shown. But then Mary Elizabeth Morstan was never a real name.
in scandal, after sherlock receives the plane tickets from mycroft and is taken to the plane, there’s a transition scene where sherlock’s in the car with the two bodyguards, and he’s talking, seemingly to himself
the guards markedly never answer him, so he isn’t talking to them. what he actually is talking about in the scene, the plane and the cover-up plan by the government, he’s actually already explained to irene the scene before that, so there isn’t any actual reason why he’d need to be explaining it to us all over again. so… is he talking to himself? literally in the scene before that, this is the conversation he and irene have
so, like, it’s pretty reasonable to assume sherlock isn’t talking to himself in the car scene, but is, in fact, talking to john? in his mind palace? Why Is He Like This… so sad and gay
1: a seductive woman who lures men into dangerous or compromising situations
2: a woman who attracts men by an aura of charm and mystery
I’m noticing some commentary arguing against Mary being a villain going around, and instead of commenting on every post with the same copy pasted text because I feel very strongly about this for painful personal reasons, here’s my all-around post for it. I’m honestly just stating how I see her character; this has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with Johnlock (in fact, I actually think she’s good for Johnlock, but I digress).
Some info is copy pasted from both this post(Mary x John is a Not Good Relationship) andthis post (Mary is not a Nice Person).
MYCROFT: You saw the whole room when you entered it. What was directly behind you when you were murdered? YOUNG SHERLOCK (sounding petulant): I’ve not been murdered yet. MYCROFT (leaning down to him): Balance of probability, little brother.
MARY LITERALLY KILLED THE MAIN CHARACTER OF THE SERIES. THIS IS A FACT. Sherlock died. A common storytelling method is for the villain to kill the main hero. Mary is THE SAME CHARACTER WHO CONVINCED THE HERO THAT SHE WAS HIS FRIEND. THE SAME FRIEND WHO PLANNED HER WEDDING EVEN THOUGH HE WAS PINING HARD FOR HER FIANCE, AND THEN SHE LATER BELITTLED AND MOCKED HIM. The same friend that HER HUSBAND GRIEVED OVER FOR TWO YEARS. And the only reason given for her to shoot Sherlock was because SHE DIDN’T WANT JOHN TO KNOW ABOUT HER PAST, even after Sherlock offered to help her. I’m sorry, but that doesn’t scream “loving housewife” to me.
One of the biggest arguments I see is the one that Sherlock himself brought up: if she really wanted to kill Sherlock, she would have shot him in the head.
Here’s the thing: She did not shoot Sherlock in the head because she knew John would have come after her immediately; a chest shot guarantees a slow (and VERY PAINFUL) death and it guarantees a worried John taking care to save a life. She knows John would not want to risk Sherlock dying again if there was a chance he could be saved, ergo, John acts to save his life.
MARY KNOWS WHAT SHERLOCK’S DEATH DID TO JOHN. AND SHE USES THAT TO HER ADVANTAGE.
Please rewatch the season with these ideas in mind. To downgrade her character to a “sweet housewife just looking to forget her past” after all this excellent character building within which she never once showed true remorse and love for any of the main cast is frankly insulting to her character.
Look, if she was really going to “change”, she would not still have her assassin’s gear five years on that STILL FITS HER LIKE A GLOVE. Sorry.
THE SHOW HAS NEVER BEEN ABOUT THE CASES. IT’S NEVER GOING TO END WITH MARY, JOHN AND SHERLOCK. IT’S ALWAYS BEEN ABOUT SHERLOCK AND JOHN’S RELATIONSHIP. IT’S ALWAYS BEEN JUST THE TWO OF THEM.
Mary is not staying. They’re building her up to be something more. And yeah, I’m actually glad about that. I love her character as a villain and I love Amanda’s portrayal of her, and it’s insulting to the brilliant writing of Mofftiss to assume that she’s just being delegated to a housewife role.
I’m not looking to change anyone’s minds, I’m just stating how I see her character, and where her arc is heading. I think it’s a great arc for her, and I look forward to where it’s going in S4.
Her hair and dress in the proposal scene and exactly like a femme fatale in a 1940′s film noir.
Ah yes, how could I forget about this too. It’s no coincidence that our first view of her face is one of a film noire lady, face constantly shadowed and everything.
He’s checking for pupil dilation, to see if there really is something there he should guard himself against. And there is. Moments later he demands John return the phone - the heart that’s been symbolically stripped of all its use by Mycroft - so Sherlock can keep it safe and away from any more harm. A reminder of love’s destructive nature. Sherlock heard that John’s in love with him, but from this very moment he knows for sure. This is him using the same technique on John that he used on Irene. And he saw both of them react the same way.
The night of Sherlock’s return, the words floating around Mary included “Cat Lover”. This is a red herring, because every other time a cat is mentioned in this show it serves to distract from something bigger.
*Sehkmet, the cat that was a suspect in the Connie Prince case in TGG
*The Lucky Cat is the shop in TBB that serves as a cover for the smuggling ring
*“CAT” was shown over and over again during Sherlock’s death in HLV as he goes through the types of guns that could’ve killed him. He immediately realizes that the type of gun doesn’t matter, it was just a distraction to what actually mattered
*On “The Science of Deduction” blog someone important asks Sherlock to help him find his missing cat - except there is no cat at all, that was just a ploy to get his attention
So this tells us Mary is a lover to someone we don’t immediately expect. David? Maybe Moriarty? Maybe her baby isn’t a Watson baby after all - I mean, look at the turn ups on her jeans!
This Irene Adler is a female version of Sherlock, so it’s no wonder they’re fascinated with each other. She literally is, I’m not being metaphorical: look at her. She’s rail thin with high cheekbones. They’ve even styled her hair as an echo of Sherlock’s. She puts on his coat and deduces alongside him. Irene is Sherlock.
She’s got a live-in friend who loves her and does her errands for her and takes care of her, but isn’t, it seems, her girlfriend. Though you certainly get the impression that she’d like to be. They are both dangerously clever. They both take care with their appearance and their costumes in order to elicit the reaction they want in the people they meet. Their realms are different, but process and the goals are pretty much the same.
I grant you, dominatrix and consulting detective are a bit far off as professions, but they have some similar elements. Sherlock and Irene are both self-employed, for one. They peer into people’s souls and determine their motives for a living. They walk into a room and take control of it, and the people around them find that irresistibly attractive. People seek them out for their expertise. They are both expert manipulators with big egos and secret emotional lives. They both want you to think they are cold, calculating, brilliant and invulnerable, and they both want to be that, but they’re both lying.
They are both fascinated by Moriarty. And they’re both gay.
Initially I thought irene was a version of Sherlock before he met John; she’s Sherlock in the past tense, colder, valuing only the game, willing to do more than just flirt with evil. But after series three, it’s clearer that Irene was a premonition of what was to come for Sherlock. She was a bright, blinking light that said: Sherlock will fall in love, and it will very nearly kill him, except that someone will intervene at the last possible moment.
I never thought Sherlock was romantically or sexually interested in Irene, but he is clearly fascinated and disturbed by her. But can you blame him? She’s him. He’s looking in a mirror, and not really sure what to make of what he sees. He loves his reflection and he loathes it at the same time. He rejects himself and all his worst fears about himself, condemns himself to death, but then gives himself another chance in the end. Live to love another day, Sherlock.
this might get buried so deep among all your other asks but I just had to say in TGG Jim came back and decided to kill Sherlock right after he and John inappropriately flirting in a pool talking about stripping and people might talk. Jealous much?
Yessssss! I never noticed that until loudest-subtext pointed it out and now every time I watch this scene I crack up when I see that mic still hooked on John’s jacket.
“Ciao, Sherlock Holmes.“ piiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimp omg
now watch me walk away that’s right honey you had no idea what you’ve been missing but now you know
yeah i bet you will catch me later but only when i want you to
alright speak into the mic now baby tell me what you thought
*heavy breathing* “Are you alright?!”
*heavy breathing intensifies* “Sh-Sherlock!”
the FUCK is going on in there
*groaning* “Oh, christ…”
*gasping for air* “Are you okay?”
WHO FUCKING CARES JUST FUCKING SAY SOMETHING ABOUT MY SUIT
*seriously labored panting* “Yeah, me, I’m fine…that thing you did, that was…good.”
THING? WHAT THING?
“I’m glad no one saw that…you ripping my clothes off in a darkened swimming pool. People might talk.”
OH HELL NO
“People do little else.”
SORRY BOYS I’M SO FUCKING CHANGEABLE PUT IT BACK IN YOUR PANTS “DOCTOR”
YOU CAN’T ACTUALLY BE INTO THAT JUMPER WEARING MOTHERFUCKER I PULLED OUT THE WESTWOOD FOR YOU I’M A GODDAMN SEX GOD LOOK AT MY EYEBROWS DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MUCH THIS SHIT COST AND THAT’S NOT ALL THAT’S BEEN WAXED I KNOW YOU LIKE YOUR CRIMINALS CLEAN SHAVEN SO LET’S FUCKING DO THIS
TAKE ME
TURN AROUND AND LOOK AT ME ASSHOLE JESUS CHRIST THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU
oh my fucking god you’re still into Doctor Wankshit.
well then you can’t be allowed to continue because it’s Mr. Sex or no one i mean i fucking strapped bombs to people for your virgin ass what else does a boy have to do to get some fucking attention besides dress like your fucking DAD i mean do i need to go shopping for flannel or something?
omg lol flannel. as if.
I am 100000000% more cheerful for having read this.
I keep think about Mark saying “what in this domestic situation were we not privy to” and it’s torturing me to wonder if they’re going to reveal that they boys were actually Together at some point before the fall, because we’ve all wondered, fic'ed, thought about the possibility, because of how they were in Hounds and TRF…and that quote is just So Leading, and I just. Please, dads, they’ve been through enough, if they were a couple before the fall, it makes everything so much more tragic, please. I cannot.
SHUT
NO
Yeeaah not gonna lie, I also thought about this again while watching the thing.
It makes watching the reveal at the restaurant even more devastating than before, and this exchange absolutely shattering.
Mark certainly makes it sound that way and THoB and TRF fit the bill. S3 is so full of open flirting and lovelorn spitefulness, what with “I prefer my doctors clean-shaven” and “I’m not going to marry her obviously, there’s only so far you can go”: they both seem to know, to know for sure, what they are to each other even if they refuse to say it out loud. How did that happen, when?
Even though they weren’t living together anymore, I’ve also contemplated that maybe something DID happen during stag night, which would explain even better the extra-charged tension, frustration and sadness after the wedding.
Unreliable narrators: that old hell.
@queerjawn your reading is heartbreaking perfection!!!
I definitely agree about a pre-Reichenbach something.
I said something similar in another post about how this relates to Sherlock mentioning giving John dance lessons. They have been dancing around each other but they never acknowledge it out in the open. Everything Pre-Reichenbach is behind “closed curtains.”
No no NO I’ve just read this at my desk at work and now I want to ACTUALLY SCREAM and I can’t I have to pretend to be a normal functioning human for the rest of the day
I have thought the same thing so many times. That they were SOMETHING, but that it was never defined, never official, and the fall broke whatever had been between them. That closeness during s2, John stopping with the sham dating, the “we need to be more careful”, the double rooms, even in ASiB Mrs. Hudson shouting to the boys BOTH UPSTAIRS IN JOHN’S BEDROOM, like I hate how much it hurts, but it FITS. It actually fits better than if they were never together because of what @queerjawn points out, there is so much coupley sniping and flirting between them, in spite of them not being together, not living together, John being with Mary. “Neither of us were the first you know” also works with Sherlock being an actual past lover of John. And I think it actually explains better John being with Mary even if he’s in love with Sherlock and Sherlock with him. It’s the ex that broke his heart, and he refuses to make himself vulnerable again, even if he desperately wants to. “Why would he care? He’s Sherlock, who would he bother protecting?” is not John being an unknowing idiot. It’s John being a betrayed lover, bitter and hurt.
okay but seriously like if this is true, which would already be painful enough, it would mean that we watched canon johnlock on screen without knowing it
Has anybody already talked about the fact that Mary is looking at what John is writing in his little notebook?
oooh… so this is Sherlock’s head= Victorian version of Mary keeping tabs on John’s blog? Maybe even how romantic the writing is? “The walls have ears…?”
Ah! “The walls have ears”!! I like this @jenna221b!
Does it have bearing on Mary’s eventual “discovery” of the conspiracy?
I was also thinking about implications for s4, Sherlock thinking that Mary knows what John knows… what John thinks is important she will have noted or investigated clandestinely… John deliberately throwing red herrings out there because he knows that she’s watching him???
Oh yes, nice! Love the stuff about John throwing red herrings… like, what if he feeds Mary a story she wants to hear in s4? And that sends her down the wrong path when she’s off doing secret assassin/Moriarty things… to be honest, I’d love for John to write up a fake or not entirely true case on his blog, I want more unreliable narrator John!
so basically, John’s taking after Mycroft??
“The Case of the Scarlet Rollmop was one of our wildest adventures….”
on a somewhat related topic how did Mary know they were returning to Baker Street that day (so she could come over and lurk in her black outfit)? when Hudders seemingly did not?
@wmsscottholmes !!!! I’ve never thought about this and wow! That’s textbook ‘villain is one step ahead, menacingly waiting for the hero’ trope right?! @deducingbbcsherlock@weeesi
you mean like she was lying in wait until Sherlock faked his death, and then moved in…….? >.>
and when we get the roof flashback that shows how Jim faked it we’ll see the three snipers – and then a fourth, in her black assassin outfit + mask, and with Sherlock’s voiceover explaining everything to John she will pull off the mask, mirroring Holmes pulling off her black veil
~fast forward~ to John meeting Mary, which we have not even heard about much less seen, and he’s trying to do his flirty thing all “oh, um, you smell nice, what’s that perfume” and she’s all :)
So that’s the TWO images they decided to include, ONE AFTER THE OTHER, in the video of the wedding photos on John’s blog.
Not that Molly is John’s foil, that Tom is Mary’s foil and that Lestrade is Sherlock’s one, but Tom is Mary’s foil and Lestrade is Sherlock’s one and Molly sure didn’t stay engaged to Tom.
If I may add another comparison:
Greg is literally leaning into Molly. Tom has his hand around her (or at least it appears to be), but they’re not even really touching. Couples should touch, especially engaged ones at a friend’s wedding.
Looking at this set up reminded me of another instance where two people, supposedly in-love enough to get married, weren’t nearly as close together as one of it’s participants was to an “un-involved” third party.
Look familiar now?
This scene has been analyzed before, but I think it adds even more to the evidence in the photos on John’s blog and the foils listed above. You could literally stick another person between Mary and John, whereas Sherlock is practically holding his hand. They may not actually be that far or close in reality, but the camera angle, which speaks for itself, is intentional.
THE FINAL PROBLEM The Reichenbach Fall brought the attention to one riddle without ever offering an explanation. What is the final problem? What does IOU mean? Why repeatedly mention them just for dropping them before the end of the episode?
MORIARTY: What’s the final problem? I did tell you …but did you listen? […]
SHERLOCK: Never liked riddles.
MORIARTY: Learn to. Because I owe you a fall, Sherlock. I owe you.
This had lead to speculation on whether they are part of a long term plot and what is the solution of said riddle.
WHAT IS THE FINAL PROBLEM? What is the final problem? Let find out with… Pitman shorthand! As you can see in the picture above, IT IS JOHN written in Pitman Shorthand looks very similar to IOU.
I = IT O = IS U = JOHN
Yes, it is you John, you keep him right.
Note: In Pitman vowels are often omitted. For example they are omitted in a mention of Sherlock’s name by the jury foreman in The Reichenbach Fall.
ALTERNATIVE “JOHN” SPELLING For the sake of comprehensiveness, there’s another way of writing John with Pitman, using the N hook, instead of the N stroke.
But it still looks like a U, as both Ns turn out like concave up curves.
WHY DID I CHECK THE “I O U” WITH PITMAN SHORTHAND? The jury foreman in The Reichenbach Fall uses Pitman shorthand or a very similar shorthand (several words of her notes have being deciphered using Pitman). She appears in the two scenes immediately before the scene introducing the “I O U” line and also in a flashback during the said scene.
JOHN = YOU = U It’s interesting to note that in The Sign of Three, during the best man speech, there is a very similar phrase to this solution:
SHERLOCK:
Not you! Not you! You.
It’s always you, John Watson, you keep me right.
And Sherlock says this like if that was the answer to the most relevant problem.
So:
JOHN = YOU in the best man speech.
YOU = U when IOU in the context of “I owe you”
JOHN = YOU = U.
Which is aligned with the Pitman Shorthand approach in which U is JOHN.
IT IS = I O As @jenna221b pointed out, still at the wedding, there is a billet that Sherlock gives to Sholto where there’s a sentence of three words, IT’S YOU, which seems a phrase in between I O U and the proposed solution IT IS JOHN.
So:
IT IS = I O
Which is aligned with the Pitman Shorthand approach in which I O is IT IS.
THE BRIDE’S YOU Emelia Ricoletti shouts a sequence of YOUs before faking suicide and then an accomplice writes YOU on the mortuary’s wall.
We are probably supposed pay attention to this YOU as the key for U = JOHN in two directions. We are supposed to connect it with:
IOU. YOU is written in a similar stile as IOU and it differs from only one letter, so we are probably meant to connect the two words, exactly as Sherlock does, since he starts thinking about Moriarty surviving immediately after seeing the writing on the wall.
The best man speech. The “It’s always you, John Watson.”comes after a sequence of NOT YOUs, just as this YOU comes after a sequence of YOUs.
YOU is also found in the journal articles right above a capitalized mention of Pitman Shorthand.
ONE-TO-MANY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CODE AND SOLUTION Considering that short forms usually have 2/3 possible meanings and that in Pitman vowels can be omitted, there’s a one-to-many relationship between “I O U” and “IT IS JOHN”. This means that “I O U” could possibly stand for a couple of other sensical phrases in regular English, but “IT IS JOHN” can only be written “I O U” in Pitman.
WHO WOULD HAVE CREATE THE HIDDEN MESSAGE? Both The Reichenbach Fall (from which comes the “I O U”) and The Sign of Three (from which comes the best man speech and the billet to Sholto) have Stephen Thompson as a co-writer. He also wrote The Blind Banker, which practically is an episode about a code. The plot of The Reichenbach Fall involved a binary code too; in fact, after Moriarty sais “…but did you listen?”, he starts tapping the binary code with his fingers, but soon after he sais “I owe you.”, which, since the binary code was fake, could be directed to the “I owe you.”.
Though there is the chance that IOU is a long term plot point and it has been added by Moffat or Gatiss to The Reichenbach Fall. Both of them co-wrote The Sign of Three too.
WHAT WOULD IT SOUND LIKE IF “I O U” WAS REPLACE BY “IT IS JOHN”? Check the result here.
POSSIBLE RESOLUTION SCENARIO According to the following theory it is possible that John Watson could be the one capable of solving this code.
If the maidis Sherlock, then that makes much more sense of this apparent throwaway moment in the crypt sequence:
The maid pops out at the EXACT moment that Watson is being all smug about recognizing that “Hooper” wasn’t a man, but a woman disguised as a man.
Big laughs in the theatre, but people were laughing for the wrong reason. Holmes’s shiteating grin gives it away: he’s the maid, and Watson failed to recognize him.
@bigassmoustache I thought you might enjoy a pictorial confirmation of our new favourite theory!
Especially tagging to thank @oldgrimalkin because if you hadn’t make the comment about the crypt, I wouldn’t have looked. BEHOLD IT IS BETTER THAN WE COULD HAVE IMAGINED.
I never noticed Sherlock’s smug little asshole grin, oh my god, this is perfect
What?!
RIGHT? Okay, so I thought the maid was just a Sherlock mirror, you know, because this show is full of mirrors.
But then I looked at the crypt scene and…wow. WOAH? Wow. That beat where the maid waves at Watson and he looks scandalized is such a *sad trombone noise* moment if it’s just a joke about Watson being, what, upset that his maid is there? No, it’s a joke on him. He’s figured out one thing and missed the important thing.
Our dads are playing with us. Hardcore. I don’t mean at our expense; I mean they are going full bore for us.
The fact that she is just so full of cheeky criticism about the state of their marriage, and that she pops up immediately after that weird apparent reconciliation moment where Watson says he thought he was losing Mary. Sherlock knows. He knows that marriage is rotten through and through.
this is perfect!! I don’t remember if we talked about this that fateful night but I feel like we didn’t. PS in hindsight her hair is so curly, I hadn’t noticed!
PS he wants her to light his fires. And dust. You know touch the human particles… and to boil his egg. like probably hard. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ and meanwhile she’s like lol you never see your wife, are you sure you’re still married?
I need to stop vigorously reblobbing my own post but your comments. YOUR COMMENTS! I think we loved the hell out of her on our first and second viewings? I mean who doesn’t? But I don’t think we caught the crypt dealio. It’s so out there? Like, really? REALLY?
So many people are discussing whether or not they believe some of the plane scenes in the Sherlock special are real, when really they should be discussing whether or not they believe some of the last scenes of His Last Vow are real. The mind palace might have taken over far earlier than we’d like to admit. There are signs if you really look for them.
I think you might be right about that. Absolutely. I mean, there could be some truth that the entire end of S3, from the moment Mary shoots him is ALL mind palace. I mean, why not? It’s just as plausible as any other theory
@the-7-percent-solution, @monikakrasnorada: I thought about that, too. It would explain the very things that many people find so hard to stomach: the whole terrible 221B scene, the less than convincing forgiveness business, the big gap between those two and, most important, Sherlock shooting CAM.
@monikakrasnorada @gosherlocked
Also doesn’t it seem weird that behind Mary at Sherlock’s parents’ house is a framed photograph of what looks like Sherlock falling in TRF? Some people have made a joke of it, but i think it’s a clue - that “forgiveness” scene at Christmas is like John choosing Mary over Sherlock, much like him falling without John there to catch him. Everything after is Sherlock’s way of saying “I need you to be happy John, because you choose her”. Sherlock summons Moriarty at the end of HLV (just like he’s summoned in TAB) to give insight to Sherlock about whether he has a fighting chance with John. Not to mention both TAB and HLV end the same way - with the droning out music and “just kidding there’s more!” extended clip. So i think the mind palace scene started when Mary shot him and hasn’t let up since.
Billy Wiggins being there, serving home-made drugs
The super secret laptop on the kitchen table
The whole restaurant scene with Magnussen and Sherlock
But then we would have a completely different situation with a still dead Moriarty and a very much alive Magnussen, wouldn’t we? With a John who does not know who shot Sherlock. With a Mary we do not know anything about, not even the bit we got. No A.G.R.A. flashdrive. Oh, this is getting more and more fun …
Also doesn’t it seem weird that behind Mary at Sherlock’s parents’ house is a framed photograph of what looks like Sherlock falling in TRF?
WHAT???? WHAT??????? I have never noticed nor seen anything about this!! OMG @the-7-percent-solution . I am going to go watch it RIGHT NOW. IF that is true, sweet holy lord, I can’t even wrap my head around that.
Thinking most of HLV takes place in the mind palace makes it all better and worse. I would LOVE a re-do of all that happened with Magnussen, that would be ideal. I am more comfortable with Sherlock’s actions after having seen the deleted CAM scene, but still, watching him commit cold-blooded murder was hard. I know his time away, he more than likely (most definitely) did far worse things, but we didn’t have to actually watch that happen.
@gosherlocked Could it be that, IF HLV ends up being mostly mind palace, it was his attempt to run through the steps and see the outcome, like he did in TAB? But, then, does it make sense for him to ‘revive’ Moriarty? Perhaps he knows that is the only thing that WOULD save him from certain death, if he were to kill Magnussen?
I can believe it happened both ways, now just digging up the clues as to what REALLY happened.
@monikakrasnorada: Possibly. It might start for example when he begins to think about Mary (Who are you?) in his mind palace, the scene with her in the hallway in Roland Kerr College, wearing the dress in which he saw her for the first time in TEH. It seemed strange to me at the time that he did imagine her in this place (where John saved him) in this dress (she did not wear when she shot him) and with the hand gesture we see only later (in the 221B scene).
Btw, here is the pic @7-percent-solution mentioned. It bears a similarity to the fall but could also be child running with outstretched arms:
I think that is the most plausible starting point. It makes so much sense and it’s almost eerily the same as the conditions of TAB. He was heavily ‘medicated’, tripping balls in his mind palace. It follows the same kind of weird, non-linear timeline. Honestly, it’s making more and more sense to me as we go along with this.
It is odd that he saw her as Mary from the first time he met her, isn’t it? Why not keep her in her wedding dress?
ETA: I posted this response before I saw that pic. Wow, @gosherlocked!!! That is eerie. I can see that it could be a child, but honestly. WHY put a photo that could be so easily mistaken for TRF when it would have been just as easy to put some other random child photo. This is a head-scratcher.
@Monikakrasnorada @gosherlocked After watching HLV tonight and discussing everything you’ve all said with my friend, we think Sherlock has been in his mind palace since discovering how evil Mary really is, then playing two scenarios out - one where John chooses Mary and one where John chooses Sherlock. TAB is all about what he could’ve done/has to do to get John to choose him. If John chooses Mary, Sherlock would essentially commit suicide. If John chooses Sherlock, he’ll have to be completely open and honest about his past and feelings. And after the extensive mind palace scene that starts in the middle of HLV and ends after TAB we see that Sherlock knows John would choose him no matter what because “there’s always two of us”.
What an interesting and bold idea. It is food for thought. But it would mean that Magnussen would have to return in series 4. What do you think?
I only have a second here (and am coming back for more discussion after I get the kidlets out the door BUT I had to put this here for now) re: Magnussen. IF Sherlock is in his mind palace from this moment forward -through the end of TAB, because it’s still possible he isn’t ‘awake’ yet- then he doesn’t know what happened to Magnussen. It’s just as plausible that Mary killed him and left Sherlock for dead, isn’t it?
@monikakrasnorada, @the-7-percent-solution: Oh, this is brilliant! Of course he would not know. And all that comes after that would be his mind trying to explain away the fact that Mary is a killer. He would try to find excuses for her in order to protect John and the baby. And it would also explain his bizarre meeting with Magnussen in the restaurant - his attempt at selling Mycroft in order to save the Watson marriage.
And also a little something that never sat right with me - Greg wanting to take a video of a drugged up Sherlock who nearly died. Of course this is an ASiB reference but being drugged by Irene and nearly being killed is not exactly the same thing. But it might be what Sherlock might think Greg would do.